Car Comparison

2005-2009 Subaru Outback vs. 2007-2011 Honda CR-V: Which Is Better?

RELATED READING
See all Subaru Outback articles
RESEARCH BY MAKE
Toyota cars, trucks and SUVs Ford cars, trucks and SUVs Honda cars, trucks and SUVs Chevrolet cars, trucks and SUVs Jeep cars, trucks and SUVs Nissan cars, trucks and SUVs BMW cars, trucks and SUVs Volkswagen cars, trucks and SUVs Subaru cars, trucks and SUVs
Acura cars, trucks and SUVs Alfa Romeo cars, trucks and SUVs AMC cars, trucks and SUVs Aston Martin cars, trucks and SUVs Audi cars, trucks and SUVs Bentley cars, trucks and SUVs BMW cars, trucks and SUVs Bugatti cars, trucks and SUVs Buick cars, trucks and SUVs Cadillac cars, trucks and SUVs Chevrolet cars, trucks and SUVs Chrysler cars, trucks and SUVs Daewoo cars, trucks and SUVs Datsun cars, trucks and SUVs DeLorean cars, trucks and SUVs Dodge cars, trucks and SUVs Eagle cars, trucks and SUVs Ferrari cars, trucks and SUVs FIAT cars, trucks and SUVs Fisker cars, trucks and SUVs Ford cars, trucks and SUVs Freightliner cars, trucks and SUVs Genesis cars, trucks and SUVs Geo cars, trucks and SUVs GMC cars, trucks and SUVs Honda cars, trucks and SUVs HUMMER cars, trucks and SUVs Hyundai cars, trucks and SUVs INFINITI cars, trucks and SUVs Isuzu cars, trucks and SUVs Jaguar cars, trucks and SUVs Jeep cars, trucks and SUVs Kia cars, trucks and SUVs Lamborghini cars, trucks and SUVs Land Rover cars, trucks and SUVs Lexus cars, trucks and SUVs Lincoln cars, trucks and SUVs Lotus cars, trucks and SUVs Maserati cars, trucks and SUVs Maybach cars, trucks and SUVs Mazda cars, trucks and SUVs McLaren cars, trucks and SUVs Mercedes-Benz cars, trucks and SUVs Mercury cars, trucks and SUVs MINI cars, trucks and SUVs Mitsubishi cars, trucks and SUVs Nissan cars, trucks and SUVs Oldsmobile cars, trucks and SUVs Plymouth cars, trucks and SUVs Pontiac cars, trucks and SUVs Porsche cars, trucks and SUVs RAM cars, trucks and SUVs Rolls-Royce cars, trucks and SUVs Saab cars, trucks and SUVs Saturn cars, trucks and SUVs Scion cars, trucks and SUVs smart cars, trucks and SUVs SRT cars, trucks and SUVs Subaru cars, trucks and SUVs Suzuki cars, trucks and SUVs Tesla cars, trucks and SUVs Toyota cars, trucks and SUVs Volkswagen cars, trucks and SUVs Volvo cars, trucks and SUVs Yugo cars, trucks and SUVs
RESEARCH BY STYLE
AWD/4WD
Commercial
Convertible
Coupe
Hatchback
Hybrid/Electric
Luxury
Sedan
SUV/Crossover
Truck
Van/Minivan
Wagon
ADDITIONAL MODEL INFORMATION

author photo by Doug DeMuro May 2016

If you're looking for a used compact SUV or crossover that boasts impressive versatility and reasonable pricing, we suspect your shopping list includes the 2005-2009 Subaru Outback and the 2007-2011 Honda CR-V. Indeed, the CR-V is an obvious pick, and while the Outback isn't technically an SUV or a crossover, its raised ground clearance, standard all-wheel drive and roomy cabin should certainly earn it a spot on your list.

But which of these two models is better? And which one should you buy? We've created a close comparison that sums up all the key differences and similarities between these two models to help you figure it out, but first let's take a look at the basics.

2009 Subaru Outback

2005-2009 Subaru Outback: The Basics

The 2005-2009 Outback was the model's third generation. Offered in sedan or wagon form, the Outback was available with a 4-cylinder, turbocharged 4-cylinder or 6-cylinder power, along with the model's signature standard all-wheel drive. Standard on all models were anti-lock brakes and side-curtain airbags, while options included leather upholstery, heated seats and automatic climate control.

2011 Honda CR-V

2007-2011 Honda CR-V: The Basics

The 2007-2011 Honda CR-V also represented the model's third generation. Available in LX, EX or EX-L trims, the CR-V touted front- or all-wheel drive, along with a more commanding view of the road than the Outback. Standard safety features included an anti-skid system, anti-lock brakes and side-curtain airbags, while options included leather upholstery, a power sunroof and dual-zone automatic climate control.

2009 Subaru Outback2011 Honda CR-V

Reliability

According to exports at Consumer Reports, the 2005-2009 Subaru Outback suffered from reliability that was far worse than average, especially because of problems with the engine and drivetrain, likely due to head-gasket failure on some models. The CR-V, meanwhile, has the exact opposite rating -- far better than average -- with Consumer Reports giving the car favorable scores in every single category.

As a result, this one's obvious: The CR-V will likely be a more reliable companion than the Outback, but that doesn't necessarily count out the Subaru. Just make sure to get a thorough mechanical inspection from someone you trust before signing the papers.

2009 Subaru Outback2011 Honda CR-V

Fuel Economy

The CR-V offered only one engine: a 166-horsepower 2.4-liter 4-cylinder (later upped to 180 hp), which was mated to a 5-speed automatic transmission. Fuel economy reached as high as 20 miles per gallon in the city and 26 mpg on the highway.

The Outback offered three different engine choices. Base models used a 170-hp 2.5-liter 4-cylinder, which offered up to 22 mpg city/29 mpg hwy with the standard 5-speed manual transmission or 23 mpg city/30 mpg hwy with the optional 5-speed automatic. Drivers looking for more power could choose between a 243-hp 2.5-liter turbocharged 4-cylinder (rated at up to 20 mpg city/26 mpg hwy) and a 245-hp 3.0-liter 6-cylinder (rated at up to 17 mpg city/24 mpg hwy).

The result: The Outback is more efficient than the CR-V, even with its standard all-wheel drive -- an item that usually diminishes gas mileage. In fact, you can opt for the 243-hp turbocharged Outback XT and still get the same fuel economy as the 166-hp CR-V, while the Outback's base engine beats out the CR-V by 3 or 4 mpg.

2009 Subaru Outback2011 Honda CR-V

Safety

In crash-test ratings carried out by the federal government's National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, both the Outback and CR-V earned a perfect 5-star score in front- and side-impact tests. However, while the Outback also earned a perfect 5-star score in rollover tests, the CR-V earned only four stars -- a function of its higher center of gravity. Although the Outback was not thoroughly tested by the nonprofit Insurance Institute for Highway Safety, the CR-V earned the firm's Top Safety Pick designation.

As for safety features, this is an area where the 2005-2009 Outback shows its slightly more advanced age compared to the 2007-2011 CR-V. While both the Outback and the CR-V offer standard anti-lock brakes and side-curtain airbags, the Subaru only offered an anti-skid system on top-of-the-line models; such a system was standard on the CR-V. Honda also offered a backup camera on the upscale CR-V EX-L, while the feature wouldn't be available in the Outback until the wagon's next generation.

As a result, we think the CR-V has a slight leg up on the Outback when it comes to safety features, especially if you opt for an upscale EX-L model with a backup camera. Meanwhile, the Outback has a slight leg up in crashworthiness, largely because of its lower likelihood of rolling over in a collision.

2009 Subaru Outback

Technology

By modern standards, neither the CR-V nor the Outback was very advanced. Both cars offered navigation systems (and, thus, center screens) only as options on their top-end trim levels, and neither model offered any sort of iPod connection beyond an auxiliary jack. In fact, the most advanced feature you'll find on either of these models (aside from the navigation systems) is dual-zone automatic climate control -- now a fairly simple extra on the vast majority of new cars.

The result: We wouldn't buy either of these vehicles if technology is a huge priority. Then again, that'll be a problem with just about all used cars at this price point. If you want tech, you'll at least want to spring for that navigation system, which was optional on the CR-V EX-L and the Outback Limited.

2009 Subaru Outback2011 Honda CR-V

Value

There are currently around 1,300 different 2005-2009 Outback models listed on Autotrader with an average price of around $9,500, while there are about 4,800 different 2007-2011 CR-V models with an average price of around $14,400. The difference is largely due to the age gap, as the 2005-2009 Outback both debuted and was redesigned 2 years before the 2007-2011 CR-V.

To us, the price difference makes the Outback a highly appealing proposition, especially when you factor in standard all-wheel drive, as the CR-V's average price jumps to around $14,700 if you add all-wheel drive to your search criteria. It's also particularly appealing when you consider that the Outback offers better fuel economy, slightly stronger crash-test scores and about the same level of equipment.

Yes, the CR-V is more reliable, but with a $5,000 price gap, you could make a lot of repairs to an Outback and still come out ahead. The result: We think the Outback is a slightly better value than its CR-V rival.

Autotrader's Advice

Both the 2005-2009 Subaru Outback and the 2007-2011 Honda CR-V are competent, affordable crossover models with versatile interiors and reasonable pricing. To us, the CR-V is the better model overall, as it touts a better driving position, more available safety features and dramatically improved reliability compared to the Outback. But is it worth $5,000 more than an Outback? If you're on a tight budget, the answer is probably not, though we'd make sure to get any 2005-2009 Outback thoroughly inspected by a trusted mechanic before buying it.

Find a Subaru Outback for sale

Find a Honda CR-V for sale

This image is a stock photo and is not an exact representation of any vehicle offered for sale. Advertised vehicles of this model may have styling, trim levels, colors and optional equipment that differ from the stock photo.
2005-2009 Subaru Outback vs. 2007-2011 Honda CR-V: Which Is Better? - Autotrader